Hi I grouped + a few free codecs, to a portable 'pack' — tested OK under Win. XP 32-bits and Win. See attachment. In some cases, you cannot install anything, nor modify Windows registry. When I was asked by office workers if editing there, at the office, would be possible, using VirtualDub — and knowing the administrator did not accept the least installation, unless by himself. The attached portable 'pack' does not modify Windows registry. While, by default, VirtualDub, though it requires no 'classic' install but a simple decompression of the archive you download from Avery Lee's site, writes to the reg istry.
So does any codec installation. Why not, then — since it's 100% autonomous, i.e.
VirtualDub Filter Pack 2014 1.3 This is a free filter/plug-in pack containing over two hundred (200) plugins for VirtualDub. VirtualDub is designed to process linear video streams, including. Jul 30, 2017 - Categories. Mirror of FccHandlers virtualdub addons. A DirectShow and Video for Windows codec (VFW). VirtualDub Icon.
![Virtualdub Codec Pack Virtualdub Codec Pack](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-CaGhRE4xkk/maxresdefault.jpg)
Exploiting its own included codecs? Because it does not allow adding any filter; while VirtualDub, being a non-autonomous tool, lets you add as many as you want (or find:, for instance). At first sight, the problem was of course the codecs. But, in fact, several can be made portable, or be used 'portably (virtualized)', along, quite simply.
I didn't append to this post, which asks the same question: as it's dated Sept. OK, I did not include ' all~ ~the~codecs '; again: just a few. ____________________________________________ NO: these 'packs' contain NO malware(s) whatsoever! 21st, 2015 Not only spywared stuff is systematically banned from my PCs etc., I wouldn't be able to prepare / program anything of that sort anyway — even if I (ever!) wanted to! Both '.7z' archives have been tested against 'virustotal.com'. The 1st one was reported to contain ''3 malwares'' — which ARE obviously false positives. Packed to portable software is almost always considered as malware.
I still wanted to get rid of those absurd alarms + needed to tidy up the 'pack' anyway: the 2nd archive is. The same (just added an html bitrate calculator), with no, or at least: less, of the useless files I had left in #1. And without the (batches-to-).exe launchers that 'virustotal.com' beeped about. However, it still reports ''2 malwares''.
Note (for fun.) as I was testing the contents (file by file, since the site doesn't indicate WHICH files are ''faulty'', within a whole archive), one, out of their collection of about 50 antivirus softwares, named 'Qihoo 360', reported 'rundll32.exe' as a ''malware'' (!) — & that, only once I packed it, to test what was 'going on'. 'rundll32.exe' is nothing but one of Windows XP basic / very ususal components. So, after 'investigating' — for one whole minute — on that crook, here's what some tech news page reports (in its turn) about it: '. Hi Baldrick Thank you for the test. I now have to find what exactly: which file(s?), causes that warning. I don't remember of anything, 'virtualized' using ' JauntePE' * (the tool I used), becoming suspicious — while softwares processed by 'VMWare Thinapp' are sometimes reported as such. * I used 'JauntePE': 1.